منابع مشابه
Risk adjustment measures and outcome measures for prehospital trauma research: recommendations from the emergency medical services outcomes project (EMSOP).
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to conduct a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature for risk adjustment measures (RAMs) and outcome measures (OMs) for prehospital trauma research and to use a structured expert panel process to recommend measures for use in future emergency medical services (EMS) trauma outcomes research. METHODS A systematic literature search and review was perform...
متن کاملRETHINKING THE ART AND SCIENCE OF RISK ADJUSTMENT Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes
In recent years many academics, health care providers, and third-party payers have focused their attention on estimating and discussing the quality of health care. This focus is derived in part from concerns that the incentives of funding systems, such as prospective payments, result in cost/quality trade-offs that have a negative impact on the health of beneficiaries (Poland, Bollinger, Bedard...
متن کاملChallenges in Risk Adjustment for Hospital and Provider Outcomes Assessment.
William S. Weintraub, MD Kirk N. Garratt, MD How are we to evaluate outcomes for the care that we provide, and how are we to benchmark ourselves compared with colleagues at other institutions? It is critical that we do this to improve our own performance, and it is also being demanded of us by other stakeholders in society. Indeed, regular public reporting of outcomes is now effectively mandate...
متن کامل[Risk adjustment measures for mortality after hip fracture].
OBJECTIVE To assess factors associated to mortality in patients with hip fracture and to describe different risk adjustment measures. METHODS Non-concurrent cohort study comprising 390 patients aged 50 years and more. Patients were identified from the Brazilian Unified Health System Hospital Information System, admitted for hip fracture surgery in a teaching hospital in Rio de Janeiro, southe...
متن کاملGranularity adjustment for risk measures: Systematic vs unsystematic risks
The granularity principle [Gordy (2003)] allows for closed form expressions of the risk measures of a large portfolio at order 1/n, where n is the portfolio size. The granularity principle yields a decomposition of such risk measures that highlights the different effects of systematic and unsystematic risks. This paper derives the granularity adjustment of the Value-at-Risk (VaR), the Expected ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Anesthesiology Clinics
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0020-5907
DOI: 10.1097/aia.0b013e3182a70a52